Head-to-head · Blitz Index v1.0 (frozen) · 2026 Q4

NVIDIA vs Advanced Micro Devices

2016's promise, completed. Moat finished, creative destruction done. OpenAI and Meta each signed 6GW — demand visibility does not get better than this.

NVIDIA (NVDA)
87
Grade A
VS
NVIDIA by 25
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)
62
Grade B
ItemMaxNVIDIAAdvanced Micro Devices
Blitz Index total/ 1008762
Grade—AB
A · Speed/ 252319
B · Moat/ 605236
C · Creative destruction/ 151510
D · Demerits/ 30-3-3

The success line is 65. Demerits (section D) are subtracted; a demerit total of 15 or more flags a company for BlitzFailing watch. Scores as of the 2026 Q4 review.

Verdict — business structure only

NVIDIA's moat (52) is far stronger than AMD's (35), driven by CUDA lock-in (7.5M developers) against AMD's contract-based lock-in (6GW OpenAI/Meta deals). NVIDIA is faster (23 vs 19) on a much larger base, with Q2 FY2027 up +106% YoY. AMD's creative destruction (9) describes a challenger displacing CPU share and building rack-scale AI, while NVIDIA's perfect 15 reflects a completed replacement of the CPU-centric data center. The structural difference is platform vs challenger: NVIDIA owns the platform the AI wave runs on; AMD is assembling its position through contracts and acquisitions.

Key figures

NVIDIAFigure
GrowthQ2 FY2027 +106% YoY
Gross margin75%
Scale90%+ AI accelerator share
Advanced Micro DevicesFigure
TTM revenue$41.3B
GrowthQ2 2026 +50% YoY; Data Center +107%

Key figures are from the companies' published score files (the scorecard's English summary). A figure is shown only where the score file states it.

How to read this

Both companies passed the same two gates before scoring: real product-market traction (G1), and a ten-year market ceiling of at least ten times current revenue (G2). The Blitz Index then grades speed (25), moat (60) and creative destruction (15), and subtracts BlitzFailing demerits (up to −30) for debt, revenue quality, governance and regulatory cost. The model is frozen at v1.0; past scores are never silently rewritten. Our own pre-registered tests found the score measures business quality — it does not predict stock returns.

Research only — not investment advice. Scores measure blitzscaling strategy from public data. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.